With artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies becoming an integral part of most business operations, MLOps vs DevOps has become a point of debate in the software development space in recent times, such as DevOps and MLOps tools.
DevOps, a set of practices that aims at breaking silos between development and operations teams, helps organizations implement seamless collaboration, automation, and continuous delivery, which brings faster and more reliable software development and deployment systems onto the table.
Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) extends DevOps functionality to address specific challenges associated with deploying and managing machine learning models. Right from data preparation and model training to deployment and maintenance of models, MLOps streamlines the end-to-end ML lifecycle. This blog toms at decode MLOps vs DevOps.
Before entering into the MLOps vs DevOps debate, it is important to understand how each concept works. MLOPs integrate machine learning workflows into the DevOps framework while adapting its practices and principles unique to ML development. This approach incorporates operational efficiency into machine learning development.
Here is a typical ML workflow:
In the MLOps vs DevOps context, both share common principles and practices in the form of CI/CD pipelines, automation, and feedback loops for the development, deployment, and monitoring of the end product.
In the MLOps vs DevOps debate, let’s review how organizations engaged in machine learning development can reap amazing benefits from MLOps. Here are a few of them:
In the MLOps vs DevOps context, most of these benefits also apply to DevOps environments.
Now, in the MLOps vs DevOps debate, here are the top 5 MLOps tools that are widely used to manage machine learning operations and ML model lifecycle.
AWS Sagemaker is a fully managed MLOps service from AWS that covers the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle. It provides the right features for data labeling, model training, deployment, and monitoring, enabling developers to easily build, train, and deploy machine learning models at scale on AWS. Developers can interact with Sagemaker using multiple interfaces. The Web API enables developers to control Sagemaker server instances remotely. The provision of managed Jupyter Notebook instances allows developers to interactively program the tool and other apps.
Vertex AI is a unified platform from Google Cloud that simplifies machine learning workflows. It comes with good features for data preparation, model training and deployment. A handy feature is the Automated machine learning (AutoML) capabilities that enable novice users without ML expertise use MLOps effectively.
Azure Machine Learning Platform offers an enterprise-grade end-to-end ML lifecycle management service with a comprehensive set of tools for building, training, and deploying ML models in Azure Cloud. It seamlessly integrates with Azure services and supports various languages and frameworks.
Popular for its collaborative Apache Spark-based platform, Databricks provides a great platform for big data analytics and machine learning wherein data scientists, data engineers, and ML engineers can seamlessly collaborate on large-scale data processing and machine learning tasks.
MLflow is an open-source platform that offers end-to-end machine learning lifecycle management. Being framework-agnostic, it allows developers to work with different ML libraries. It offers handy tools for experiment tracking, deploying models on various environments, and packaging code into reproducible runs.
As you delve deep into MLOps vs DevOps, understanding how DevOps works is important, too.
DevOps is a set of practices designed to improve seamless collaboration and communication between the development and operations teams throughout the software development lifecycle. The goal is to create shorter development cycles, deliver software faster, and enhance the quality and reliability of the delivered products.
Here are the key components of DevOps:
DevOps ensures a continuous improvement culture wherein you regularly assess and refine processes. DevOps culture emphasizes creating cross-functional teams comprising individuals with diverse skills and working with a holistic approach which means every member of the team is accountable throughout the software lifecycle.
DevOps transforms the software development lifecycle with seamless collaboration, automation, and customer-centric focus for enhanced business results. Here are a few key benefits of DevOps.
Whether you need a DevOps engineer or a complete team, ClickIT can help you automate your applications, decrease time to market, increase efficiency, and reduce IT costs. Book a call.
In the MLOps vs DevOps debate, let’s review the DevOps tools, also referred to as DevOps technologies. Here are some of the popular DevOps tools.
Git is a distributed version control system that is highly popular for tracking changes in the code during the software development process. By efficiently managing code branches, facilitating version control, and providing a history of changes, Git allows multiple developers to collaborate efficiently on development projects.
GitLab, GitHub, and Bitbucket are a few popular Git-based platforms that provide collaborative environments for managing source code repositories. They facilitate version control, branching and collaboration among development teams.
Jenkins is a popular open-source automation server that facilitates CI/CD in a software development project. By automating the build, test and deployment phases, Jenkins allows organizations to deliver software rapidly and reliably. The plugin architecture supports various tools and technologies which enables users to seamlessly integrate Jenkins with diverse environments.
Jenkin’s web interface for configuring CICD pipelines makes it easy for developers to automate repetitive tasks, accelerate the delivery process and improve the quality and reliability of code.
Read the blog Gitlab vs Jenkins
Ansible is a popular open-source automation tool for configuration management, task automation and application deployment. The tool uses a declarative language wherein users can define desired states for system configurations and orchestrate automation across various nodes in the environment.
Ansible is simple and easy to use. It is an agentless tool and communicates over SSH or PowerShell. To execute a task multiple times, users simply create a playbook under the source code.
Terraform is an Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) tool that enables organizations to define and provision the infrastructure using a declarative language approach.
It supports various cloud providers and on-premises environments. By describing infrastructure components in a simple human-readable language, Terraform delivers improved collaboration, high scalability and reproducibility of the infrastructure. Terraform allows organizations to implement agile and scalable architectures by streamlining infrastructure management and deployment automation.
Kubernetes is a highly popular open-source container orchestration platform used for deployment automation, scaling and management of containerized apps.
This technology takes a declarative configuration approach to automate tasks such as scaling, load balancing and self-healing and simplifies container orchestration. It provides a robust infrastructure for organizations to run distributed, microservices-based apps across clusters of machines. Kubernetes brings consistency in application deployment across environments, scales well and helps in optimal resource utilization.
Read our blog DevOps Automation Tools to discover more tools!
Whether you call it MLOps vs DevOps or DevOps vs MLOps, they don’t compete with each other. Shared principles, overlapping tools and techniques and collaborative opportunities between MLOps and DevOps highlight the potential for a seamless integration of both practices for holistic and efficient software development and ML workflows.
Because MLOps is derived from DevOps, both concepts share similar goals and fundamental principles. For instance, the cultural shift towards breaking down silos between different teams and facilitating a more integrated and efficient approach to software development is a common agenda of MLOps and DevOps. Similarly, both emphasize collaboration and automation for delivering quality and reliable software or machine learning models quickly.
When it comes to tools and techniques used in both MLOps and DevOps, there is a significant overlap. Continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines are a key component of both practices. Similarly, version control systems and infrastructure as code (IaC) tools are other examples of tools used in both domains. This convergence highlights how compatible and adaptable MLOps tools and machine learning workflows are, with DevOps practices.
MLOps vs DevOps provide collaborative opportunities for developers, operations teams and data scientists to adopt a unified approach to development and machine learning models. Together, they can streamline processes, leverage automation and enhance the overall efficiency of software development lifecycle and ML models.
They can also share best practices to benefit from each other’s experiences. This collaboration helps in continuous improvement across the entire development environment while ensuring consistency and accelerated delivery.
When it comes to MLOps vs DevOps, both share core principles but differ in terms of data-centric challenges, collaboration, model lifecycle management, performance monitoring, key tools and roles.
DevOps operates in a broader space compared to MLOps. DevOps focuses primarily on code versioning and continuous delivery. On the other hand, MLOps focuses on more data-centric issues such as data quality, versioning and feature engineering which are crucial to machine learning datasets and model workflows.
While MLOps and DevOps emphasize collaboration between different teams related to development and operations, they differ in the nature of collaboration. MLOps focuses on domain-specific knowledge and promotes collaboration between data scientists, data engineers and other domain-related experts.
Both MLOps and DevOps efficiently address product lifecycle management. However, the key difference between DevOps vs MLOps lies in the end product. DevOps focuses on the application code lifecycle. However, MLOps is more specific towards machine learning model management. MLOps emphasizes the end-to-end lifecycle of machine learning models, covering versioning, experimentation and retraining of ML models.
In the MLOps vs DevOps, the debate MLOps focuses on continuous monitoring of model performance to detect and resolve issues related to concept drift and degradation over time. On the other hand, DevOps emphasizes application performance and infrastructure metrics instead of machine learning models.
While DevOps vs MLOps show a significant overlap of tools, both differ in terms of the usage of tools. DevOps uses tools such as Jenkins and Kubernetes that are more related to traditional software development and deployment lifecycle. Organizations use MLOps tools such as DVC and MLflow for domain-specific tasks such as data versioning, model management and experiment tracking.
MLOps introduces a few new roles that are not prominent in traditional DevOps environments. In MLOps work environments, you’ll come across roles such as machine learning engineers, data scientists and data engineers. As MLOps deals with data-related tasks and machine learning model development, the roles reflect this domain expertise.
Read the blog Hire DevOps engineer to learn more about a DevOps roles!
MLOps vs DevOps share certain core principles and goals but differ in their focus and the challenges they address. While DevOps focuses on general software development and IT operations, MLOps adapts DevOps practices and tailors them to address complexities of machine learning development and deployment, data-centric processes and model lifecycle management. In addition, MLOps introduces specialized roles with domain-specific expertise in data science and model management and dedicated tools to meet the unique demands of machine learning workflows.
In conclusion, it is not about MLOps vs DevOps or DevOps vs MLOps. Both MLOps and DevOps promote efficiency and reliability in streamlining software and machine learning development processes.
In DevOps, versioning is primarily applied to code. With MLOps, versioning is not confined to code but extends to datasets, artifacts and configurations. This approach allows organizations to reproduce machine learning experiments and track changes in models over time.
Yes, MLOps face challenges in CI specific to model training and validation. Managing diverse data sources, handling model versioning during CI and ensuring consistent results across different environments are a few unique challenges that are not typically encountered in a traditional DevOps environment.
The choice depends on the organizational requirements. If your organization works with machine learning model development and deployment, MLOps is good. On the other hand, DevOps suits organizations that focus on overall software development
Have you ever wondered how businesses easily process enormous volumes of data, derive valuable insights,…
Discover the steps for developing cloud applications, from costs to cloud app deployment
Imagine launching your product with just the core features, getting honest user feedback, and then…
When a tight deadline is non-negotiable, every second counts! Here’s how we developed and launched…
You may have considered hiring a nearshore software development company or services, but you still have doubts…
End-to-end project management goes as far back as you can remember. Every project in history, even…